Curse

Apache.Scythe · Nov 30, 2007, 06:14 AM // 06:14

Well i think some people would agree with me on this.
im sure there are alot of players who have several of the same mod or inscription.

So i think having identical Mods and Inscriptions stack would benefit the players by make inventory's or player vault alot more organized.

Here is a example of what i mean:
eg1. By placing a "Strength and honor" 15^50 Inscription over another "Strength and honor" 15^50 - they will successfully stack

eg2. By placing a "Strength and honor" 15^50 Inscription over another "Strength and honor" 14^50 Inscription -they will NOT successfully stack

eg3. By placing a "Strength and honor" 14^50 Inscription over another "Strength and honor" 14^50 Inscription -they will successfully stack

Same theory goes for weapon mods

LuckyStripe · Nov 30, 2007, 06:19 AM // 06:19

Makes sense.

/singed

}[ing Clemo · Nov 30, 2007, 06:25 AM // 06:25

Mods and Inscrips take up a lot of my space too, good idea.
/signed

arcanemacabre · Nov 30, 2007, 06:29 AM // 06:29

/signed, as long as it doesn't take too much to code something like this. I've got so many copies of different inscriptions eating up all my storage on my secondary account it's not even funny.

RPGmaniac · Nov 30, 2007, 06:49 AM // 06:49

/signed because my storage is full of duplicates of inscriptions/weapon upgrades.

I can't help but wonder though if there is a reason Anet hasn't done this already beyond them not wanting to or not thinking of it.

MudBone · Nov 30, 2007, 09:17 AM // 09:17

Will defenitly save some space and partially satisfy some of those crying for more storage space.

/signed

Sol Deathgard · Nov 30, 2007, 09:38 AM // 09:38

I like it, I have so many mods saved for Hero wepons that I have no storage space at all
/signed

A11Eur0 · Nov 30, 2007, 10:26 AM // 10:26

This will save up about 10 slots just from Measure for Measure inscrips alone.

tipiak · Nov 30, 2007, 01:40 PM // 13:40

Same here, have to use 2 slots to store all insignias, runes, mods ...
/signed

MithranArkanere · Nov 30, 2007, 04:55 PM // 16:55

It's just like runes.
Allow stacking, and people will hoard them to use them as coins.

Add a trader, like with runes. That's way better.

Auntie Social · Dec 01, 2007, 12:45 AM // 00:45

/signed

Perhaps we could also all have our own bookshelf in storage too for all the journals and books we have been getting lately.

MudBone · Dec 01, 2007, 01:14 AM // 01:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Auntie Social

/signed

Perhaps we could also all have our own bookshelf in storage too for all the journals and books we have been getting lately.

Another good idea to start a signed to suggestion thread on.

The Legg · Dec 03, 2007, 11:47 AM // 11:47

/signed

This and other suggestions as to the stackability of other items should be implemented. No sane reason not to, the storage space taken up by these items is horribly big.

legion_rat · Dec 03, 2007, 01:10 PM // 13:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by MithranArkanere

It's just like runes.
Allow stacking, and people will hoard them to use them as coins.

Add a trader, like with runes. That's way better.

/signed (for mithrans idea)

It would work better. And people would start hording, then everone would bitch when it messed with the prices "oh god the economy!!! we're all gonna die!" or something similar.

~the rat~

bilateralrope · Dec 03, 2007, 09:24 PM // 21:24

If two items are identical, why shouldn't they be stackable ?

/signed

Quote:

Originally Posted by MithranArkanere

It's just like runes.
Allow stacking, and people will hoard them to use them as coins.

Their value isn't well known enough for this to be effective without a trader to let everyone know the price. So I don't see them replacing ecto.

Quote:

Add a trader, like with runes. That's way better.

I've given my support for a trader in every thread that asks for one.

Snow Bunny · Dec 03, 2007, 10:10 PM // 22:10

/signed

1 2 chars